From Reagan to Obama, a brief Political History

My Journey from being a Reagan Republican to an Obama Democrat

I grew up in a Southern Baptist Church along the Gulf Coast in Texas. It was a suburban church nowhere near a bus line, protected as it were from most demographics that didn’t have our common interests. Those interests were embodied in the Republican Party, then led by President Ronald Reagan. Reagan captured our attention with an anti-communist, anti-atheist message, that was easy to understand, emboldening the American people against a clear threat , that of nuclear war and a godless communist regime. Reagan rode that same horse his entire career, even as an actor while President of the Screen Actors Guild, taking stands against blacklisted actors and directors thought to be sympathizers with communist ideology. The Democrats, on the other hand, were squishy, hard to understand, and believed life was complicated. They sounded intellectual and suspicious.

We were told that if Democrats were given power we would certainly be destroyed by nuclear weaponry, indefensible by our weak military. We were told that, if a Democrat lived in the white house, we would become a socialist nation and you would not be able to choose your own profession, drive a car that you wanted or attend a school of your preference. The government would make those decisions for you, we were told. We were taught all sorts of terrible things about the Democrats. We were told if a Democrat ever came to power the government would launch legislation that would mandate ten-percent of all public-school teachers be homosexuals. But when a Democrat came to power, none of that happened. Instead, the average family’s base-earning went up by $7,500 per year and we operated under a balanced budget. And we didn’t go to war against an enemy we couldn’t exactly find and certainly didn’t understand.

Our theology insinuated that shortly after original sin, once Adam and Eve at the apple, they registered as Democrats and went on with their lives, trying to create large governments that would enable lazy people through expensive social programs. We believed we were right and they were wrong, our ideas were Biblical and their ideas were pagan. And we did not know, exactly, who “they” were. Our church wasn’t on a bus line, and our church programs catered to a slim demographic, and so “they” didn’t come to our church. We were all of the same race, the same theological disposition. Our conservative, moral ethos transcended politics. We looked down on Methodists and Catholics because they drank and danced. In fact, when one of the elders at our church visited a western bar with his wife and another couple, presumably to participate in a line-dancing event, our pastor had him paged at the dance hall and told him to meet him in his office, immediately at the church. He was forced to resign as an elder, scolded by the pastor and later committed suicide, leaving behind a wife and three children, along with a grieving, confused church.

My mother was active, politically. She would occasionally volunteer when her Christian beliefs were threatened by government legislation. I remember her coming home late one night, having worked on a campaign opposing equal rights for same-sex partnerships. She told a thrilling story about a fellow volunteer who had a bullet-hole through his license plate, presumably put there by a lone, homosexual gunmen. And when a law was proposed banning spanking in public schools, my mother put my sister and I into the car and drove to the capital, in Austin, where we visited our state legislator. We sat on a leather couch across from his desk and my mother wagged her finger at him and, in no uncertain terms, told the man exactly what the Bible said about sparing the wand. I sat breathless and quiet. I had seen that wagging finger before and I knew what came after. I breathed again only when we were leaving the man’s office and I was assured my mother would not be taking the legislator over her knee.

Like I said, I grew up in the Reagan years. My mother, single and struggling as a secretary at an oil company, afforded a house because of a special loan available, in part, due to legislation proposed by the Reagan administration. We loved that man. I remember being in algebra class, my junior year in high school, when the principle came over the speaker system to announce there had been an accident, that the space shuttle Challenger had exploded over the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Florida. All the astronauts were lost. Those astronauts were our men, you see. They were from Houston, and lived only twenty miles from my house. There was a gasp at first, then a long minute of silence, led by the principle himself. School was dismissed, after that. We all went home and watched the footage on television. We watched all afternoon as flowers were placed along the gates at NASA, and on the sidewalks of the Astronauts homes. That night Ronald Reagan was to address the nation in the State of the Union speech. Those plans were changed, of course, and he came to us live from the Oval Office, perfectly delivering comforting lines I now know to have been written by Peggy Noonan, who borrowed her lines from the poet John Magee:

“We will never forget them,” Reagan said, “nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for their journey and waved good-bye and “slipped the surly bonds of earth” to “touch the face of God.”

i don’t know of a political figure who could have more nobly delivered those lines. I have since longed for a statesman who understood and could employ words to unite our country during a difficult time.

This year’s Democratic National Convention was not the first political convention I attended. Sixteen years ago, then just a kid, I attended the Republican National Convention in Houston. I was not invited, but my mother found out that many of the local hotels hosted delegates, and if you went to the concierge and told them you’d like to go, many of the hotels had passes. Security was a bit different, then. And so my friend and I put on ties and carried clip boards and tried to look as professional as possible, and we made our way through security with false credentials, walked confidently through the press boxes and even sat behind the Bush family during the speeches. George W. was there, working on his fathers campaign. And Barbara in an elegant dress, and the girls, then just children. George H.W. Bush was running for reelection that year, against a governor from Arkansas who ran on the platform of change. Bush had promised the American people he would not raise taxes, but in the end had to break that promise, and that broken promise, along with an ailing economy, would cost him the election.

We didn’t like Bill Clinton. We listened to Rush Limbaugh, who told us not to think, that he would think for us, and so we bitterly groused against large government and our supposedly growing welfare state. He was a pro-choice candidate with a feminist wife who belittled women who only wanted to “stay home and make cookies.” Those were our women, we thought. And they made very good cookies.

I even attended a special camp in Colorado Springs in which we, as students (I thought we’d be campers, but we were in fact students) sat through eight to ten hours of lectures every day, covering why the Republicans were right, and why the democrats were wrong. We were taught George Guilder’s economic theory and that America’s drug problem was actually a communist infiltration. We learned there was no such thing as global warming, and the only way to build an economy was to deregulate the financial industry. (Total depravity, as a theological reality, did not apply to people in suits.) We were told a broader availability of healthcare was socialism, and we were shown images of poor communists (Rather than filthy rich and healthy Europeans) we were taught government programs would enable the lazy. We were taught to be angry, and to rise up against the secular humanist enemy that was trying to take away our way of life. And we were made to be afraid. They were out to get us. One night I had a long conversation with a young man in which I tried to convince him that bombing an abortion clinic would not be the best way to solve the problem. I went back to the camp, three-years running. The truth is I learned to think at the camp, to consider ideas to and defend positions. But my learning to think would ultimately be my demise. I wouldn’t just read conservative columnist and authors; I’d read the liberal ones too. And I’d read the British thinkers, too, in the Economist. And even more to my demise, I actually met the enemy, the students of Reed College, one of the more progressive campuses in the country. And I’d befriend Democrats, like my neighbor who is the former Governor of Oregon. I learned, then, that complicated problems could not be solved through simple solutions and emotional, even patriotic rhetoric. I also learned liberal, wishful thinking was fruitless. I learned to trust the value of numbers, hard data, and to realize nearly everybody has a motive, and power corrupts. I was shocked to find out abortion had decreased by 18% under President Clinton, and another 8% under George W. Bush (a significant slowing) and the pro-life lobby had largely ignored the economic factors that contribute to unwanted pregnancy. Bill Clinton won me over, in part for the unbelievably harsh things my Christian friends would say about him after the Monica Lewinsky scandal (and in part because the original investigation that unearthed the Lewinsky case found the President innocent of all white-water charges), but mostly because he spent the last year of his Presidency traveling to the most poor regions of America apologizing for his failure as President to help those he referred to as “the least of these.”

I didn’t realize the term “the least of these” was about to apply to my family. After more than 25 years working in the oil industry, my mother lost her entire retirement when Enron collapsed. Since then I’ve always thought we should have more regulation over companies that control enormous portions of America’s overall economy. My mother went back to school, having retired, and earned her Bachelors and Masters degrees and started teaching at the college level. She’s not teaching any longer, but still works today, though she should have retired years ago. She likes her job and her job likes her, and I’ve never heard her complain. Still, I wish Jeff Skilling would fork over the money he stole from her.

Having met the enemy, I discovered the enemy wasn’t who I thought they were. They were flawed, even as we were flawed, but they were no less patriotic, and no less good. And what’s more, they weren’t out to get us like my conservative friends had told me. I began to see, honestly, the far conservative right, the radical right (not the balanced, objective right) as being paranoid. The advertisements on conservative radio talk shows were about guns and alarm systems.

I wondered how I could be made to feel so prejudiced against Democrats. And then I took a hard look at the culture I was raised in. I realized every church I’d ever attended had been an insular community. Every church had been far off in the suburbs, off a bus line, protected from the poor and marginalized and, quite honestly, racial minorities. It’s not that these churches did this intentionally. I don’t believe that. The decisions to reside in the suburbs had to do with property value and opportunity. But the end result was an insulated existence.

I heard a lecture once at a Christian conference by a man who had moved he and his family into the hardest neighborhood in Fresno, California. He told us that he had never really cared about the problem of police apathy until one night when a bullet went through his daughter’s window and he called the police and they never came. His point was that, until we understand firsthand the urgency of a problem, we simply don’t believe it is important. Solidarity matters. And what’s more, when we live insular lives, when everybody around us believes the same things we do, has our same color skin, shares our political interests, we are easily made to believe absurdities about everybody else.

A few days ago I did an interview with a writer for The Today Show, and after the interview she asked how it was evangelicals could come to believe the many lies being spread about Barack Obama. In answer I came back to the insular nature of the suburban church. “When we’ve never met people,” I said, “we are easily manipulated into demonizing them. We are easily made to fear.” And I’ll add there has been a great deal of fear in this campaign. I just received a letter, yesterday, from a prominent church leader in Georgia that accused Michelle Obama, who I have met and found to be a lovely and humble woman, of being be a racist. This was not a small-town backwards preacher, this was a best-selling Christian author, who, honestly, should be ashamed of himself.

Last year I vowed I wouldn’t make decisions out of fear. And because of that I’ve had one of the greatest years of my life. I went to Uganda and got to meet with the man who helped write their constitution. I wrapped up an evangelism project I believe will introduce more than a million people to the gospel. I rode my bike across America. All of this stuff took some degree of risk. But when calculating those risks, I realized the only reason not to try was fear. What if I was wrong, what if I couldn’t make it, what if the project didn’t work? But none of my heroes are controlled by fear. The commandment most often repeated in scripture, in fact, is “do not fear.” Fear is often something unrighteous trying to keep you from doing something good.

They will never write stories about people controlled by fear. Stories are written (and for that matter lived) by people willing to take stands against bullies and think for themselves. A month after returning home from Washington D.C., where the bike tour ended, I got a call and was asked to deliver a closing prayer at the DNC. Many of my friends told me not to go, that it would hurt my career. I was afraid, for a second, but then knew when you were asked to go somewhere and pray, you should. Fear is always a sign that a great story is about to be written (or not, depending on how you respond.) People live the most boring lives because they stand down when they encounter fear. And so I said yes.

While in Denver I met people from the Obama Campaign. I met Joshua Dubois and Paul Monteiro, Obama’s faith-policy advisors. Paul, like me, had been a Republican until recently. He is a staunch pro-lifer who got tired of Republicans not making enough strides on the issue and was won over by the dramatic effect economic policy has on unwanted pregnancy and the bottom-up effects of economic stimulation as opposed to the conservative, supply-side policy. And Joshua spoke to me about Senator Obama’s personal faith, his commitment to close his events in prayer, his daily morning devotions and his twenty-year history of talking openly about Jesus. I didn’t need to be won over. I’d started a mentoring foundation in Portland two years before and was attracted to Obama’s message on responsible fatherhood (along with his backing of The Responsible Fatherhood Act.)

I told Joshua and Paul I had been supporting the Senator since well before he decided to run, and told them I’d help in any way during the closing months of the campaign. Since then, I’ve received more than my share of e-mails containing the most absurd lies. Barack Obama is a Marxist, a terrorist who trained with Al-Qaida, that he has a pet dragon he flies on nights when there is a full moon and that if we vote for him all the computers will stop working at midnight on new years eve. I wondered how simple a person would have to be to believe such lies.

I voted for Barack Obama (we vote early in Oregon) because I think he is right on healthcare (his plan will allow 27 million more Americans, including young, pregnant mothers to be cared for) and he is right on responsible fatherhood. I voted for Barack Obama because he will keep George W. Bush’ Faith-based Partnerships Program in play, only increasing it’s funding. I voted for Barack Obama because he has the respect of world leaders, which will be necessary to deliberate an American agenda around the world, and I voted for Barack Obama because he had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq. I’ve taken some blows from the conservative right on my stance, but, even in public debate against McCain representatives, have not been deterred. I will not be guilted, shamed or controlled. I am not going to vote for one candidate because I have been made to fear the other. I support Barack Obama because he has beat back the dark hour of cynicism and irrational fear, and provided hope to a country closing in on itself. I believe there are great days ahead.

I will be glad tomorrow, when all this campaigning is done. Regardless of whether you agree with me or not, please vote. And thank you for considering these thoughts.

Sincerely,

Donald Miller

Find Our Where to Vote!

Comments (149) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

PA Times and Locations

I’ll be participating in a debate tonight in Camp Hill, PA. Representatives from the McCain/Palin campaign will be present, as well as policy representatives from Obama/Biden. We will be addressing healthcare, immigration, energy, education, the economy and job creation along with the important social issues.

Here are the times and locations:

Oct 29th

Camp Hill, PA: Oct 29th, 7:00 P.M.

Faith and Politics Forum

2645 Lisburn Rd.                                               

Camp Hill, PA

 

Thanks again for your support as we near the finish line of this campaign. The schedule has been crazy, but it’s all been worth it. I realize, if you are reading the comments on this blog, it seems like there is a lot of tension out there, but in the events I’ve attended there has only been objectivity and civility. The experience has renewed my faith in the goodness of the average man. I’ve attended about twenty events covering all the battle-ground states and we simply haven’t encountered the least bit of tension. Not sure where it comes from online. I doubt we are our best when we can hide behind our computers, but I assure you America is doing fine. 

I’ll post a final recap before November 4th. I hope to get home this weekend, before the Texas vs. Texas Tech game (Go Longhorns!) and will get it up before election day. That said, though, many, if not most of the posts mention the unfortunate reality of abortion. I wanted to share a study with you from which I get a great deal of confidence that the issue should also be considered economically. I will be talking about this more, though in brief, in my recap, but for now the data will have to suffice as my answer to those sending questions about the issue. Thanks again for your consideration. 

The link is to a Catholic, pro-life study about the factors that lead to unwanted pregnancy and abortion. The study compares, in part, legal strategy with economic strategy. Both seem important, but one certainly trumps the other. Unfortunately, neither party manages to encompass both approaches.  

http://www.catholicsinalliance.org/files/CACG_Final.pdf

(Regarding posting comments. I have to go through each comment, and I am unable to do that while on the road. Also, because I can’t read all the links, I can’t post comments with links. Other than that, I should be home soon. Thanks.)

Comments (5) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

The New Bike

I picked up my Ritchey BreakAway yesterday from Veloce over on Hawthorne. I’ve been waiting a while as Ritchey was backordered on the bike. I was surprised to get the call because I ordered it two months ago and they told me it wouldn’t be available for six months. Anyway, the cool thing about this bike, other than the fact Tom designed it, is that it comes apart at the seat-post and the down-tube, plus the cables disassemble and the whole thing will fit into a suitcase. You can literally fly it around for free. I was getting dinged a hundred bucks either way with the other bike, and so I wasn’t taking it anywhere, obviously. So in time, this bike will pay for itself. But even though it’s a travel bike, it is stiff and responsive. It’s a ti-carbon combo. The rear triangle is carbon (save the down tube) and everything else is ti. It has the same group as my I.F. so it feels right. I took it for a ride around Portland tonight and the bike felt fine. My I.F. may get lonely this winter.

One of the reasons I bought this bike is because when Tom comes to town we usually go out for a ride and it’s always embarrassing because I didn’t have a single Ritchey part on the I.F. So now I have the whole bike. Besides, in supporting Ritchey Bikes, I also get to support Project Rwanda, and that’s worth it. Anyway, that’s what is new around here.

Comments (12) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

The Mentoring Project goes Live


Share our donation page with your friends, and join us as we rewrite the story of the fatherless generation!
(You may have to pause it for a second to let it load.)

Also, use the comment section below to thank a mentor in your life. We are collecting stories for our site. And if you are a mentor, thanks. You are making a greater difference than you could possibly know.

Comments (16) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

The Tossing of the Pumpkin

Last night we had a pumpkin carving party here at the house. A great time had by all. But the culminating event was definitely the tossing of the pumpkin. I hope it becomes an annual event. My friend Kevin Rogers happened to bring a video camera and caught the action. Thanks Kevin.


Pumpkin Toss from Kevin Rogers on Vimeo.

Comments (19) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

You Can Make our First Commercial

Over at The Mentoring Project, we are about to launch our all-encompassing donation page. This page will feature a video that essentially invites people to participate in our program by sponsoring a mentor. That’s where you come in. We are inviting people to help us by making a (45 second or under) commercial.

We will then feature your commercial on our site, and will direct our entire e-mail list to see your commercial. And we will be sure to tell people who you are in case you do this sort of thing for a living. But mostly, you’ll be helping out an incredible cause.

Here’s what you need to know about TMP in order to make a commercial:

• The Mentoring Project is recruiting ten-thousand mentors through one-thousand church-based programs.

• It costs $5 per month to sponsor a mentor.

• People can sponsor a mentor online, on the same page where your commercial will be featured.

So, whether you do this sort of thing professionally, or you’re taking a class and need a good project, we’d be blessed to feature your commercial. 

You can e-mail your commercial link to: hannah@belmontfoundation.org

We will be able to feature more than one, of course, and I’ll post them on the blog, too. Thanks for joining us!

Comments (6) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

I’m endorsing a candidate, and it’s not Obama or McCain!

We are proud to reveal our new logo! Those of you who read this blog are the first to lay eyes on The Mentoring Project’s (formerly The Belmont Foundation) new logo. But we don’t believe it will be the last time you see it. We have an ambitious vision. We are recruiting ten-thousand mentors through one-thousand church-based programs. And that is just phase one. We hope to eventually recruit one-million mentors to answer to the American crisis of fatherlessness. 

If you happen to be in Portland this week, swing by our “Mentoring for President” convention. Here is the official invitation:

On October 16th at the Adrianna Ballroom in downtown Portland, we are nominating Mentoring for President. And in order to do so, we are having a makeshift political convention complete with streamers, bumper stickers, buttons and flags.

We are nominating Mentoring for President because Mentoring has been proven to reduce crime, teen pregnancy, teen drop out rates, abortion and divorce. Those are promises no politician can make and certainly no politician can keep.

And if this party sounds boring, don’t worry. I will be reading material from a new book, so there will be more than a few laughs. It will be a great night, so invite your friends. 

Make plans today to join us on October 16th at 7:00 pm at the Adrianna Grand Hill Ballroom. The ballroom is located at 918 SW Yamhill Street, Portland, on the second floor. Please RSVP to Hannah by Monday, October 6th. Email hannah@belmontfoundation.org or call the office at (503) 477-8920 to confirm.

Of course this is all in fun, but we firmly believe mentoring is a very real hope for many of the problems our country is facing. We believe mentoring can lower crime, teen pregnancy, school drop-out rates, divorce as well as the quality of life for millions of children growing up without a male role-model! 

If you can’t make the “convention” you can join our mission by supporting a mentor. It takes $5 per month to support a mentor, and of course you can support as many as you like. Join us today!

Children who have role models are:

  • 46 % less likely to use drugs or alcohol
  • 53% less likely to skip school
  • 33% less likely to resort to violence
  • 59% more likely to get better grades

 

There is very real hope. Join our campaign today!

(Our new logo was created by Ivey and McCoig, a firm out of Nashville who has done all the world pro-bono. They are incredible, and we are grateful for their friendship!)

Comments (39) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

On the Campaign Trail in MI, IN, NC, VA and OH This Week

(The PA and OH schedule is coming in, and will be quite busy. But I still don’t have a copy of it. If you sign up on twitter, I will text you about the events. Simply text “follow donmilleris” to 40404. Thanks!)

(Photo taken in NC, and taken off of Facebook. THANKS!) (And hello Melinda at Campbell)

 

This weekend, along with next week I will be traveling to swing states with the Obama Campaign. We will be holding forums in several cities in order to have a conversation about faith and the changing nature of politics in America. I will be addressing many of the more heated issues, but so far each event has been overwhelmingly positive, even though people from varying perspectives find themselves in the audience. My hope is this next week will be more of the same.

I realize many of my readers feel strongly about this election, as we all should, and have been angered by my support of the candidate they are not voting for. I understand your anger, but I hope you will trust those of us who are voting for Barack Obama do so with the best of intentions and what we believe are good reasons. I will explain my position on two of those issues below to avoid much of the tense rhetoric that follows any mention made of the Democratic Candidate. But first, here are the times and locations we have so far for the tour:

**(These are not fundraising events, and are open to the public. Joshua Dubois, National Religious Coordinator for the Obama Campaign will be with us as well. So come and join the open forum.)**

Eastern University in Philadelphia October 7th

Messiah College, October 8th. Check with the school for details. Things are still fuzzy here.

 

Events in OH to come. I will only be able to post them with about 24-hours notice. 

 

There will be many more events in Indiana and Ohio, but this is what we have on the schedule so far. I will continue to update this post as I have more information.

 

As for the issues that bring the most heat.

On abortion:

I am a pro-life voter, but do not believe John McCain’s plan on the issue will work. McCain’s only stand on the issue has been a recent switch to a pro-life position, and a promise to continue the attempt to criminalize abortion through the Supreme Court.I believe this is an empty promise, and anybody who understands our judicial system would know this. Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court (our most conservative Judge, many feel, and the pro-lifers greatest hope for the plan to criminalize abortion) has stated that Roe V. Wade “is the law of the land” and has been backed up in precedent by the Casey case. He does not believe it is plausible to overturn both rulings. Of course it is possible, but it would take a judicial miracle and the appointment of even more conservative, activist judges. This is the only way the overturning of Roe V. Wade will happen. The continuation of rhetoric about being pro-life but not having a realistic plan has tired me of the Republican Party. As more and more evangelicals walk away, I hope Republicans will stop giving lip-service to this important issue. My hope is they will realize they are going to lose more and more votes until they are willing to engage in a bipartisan effort to make progress with comprehensive legislation that is realistic and actual. 

The Democrats have proposed comprehensive legislation called the 95/10 initiative that aims to reduce the number of abortions that take place in this country by 95% within 10 years. While Barack Obama is a pro-choice candidate, he supports this and similar legislation. This is the only proposed and realistic strategy that can move us around the cultural impasse that is breathing hate and anger into the Christian community. 

While Barack Obama opposes late-term abortions, he has made promises to the National Organization or Women to make progress in a woman’s right to chose. I wish Obama were more strong on this issue. Still, I do feel he will accomplish more than John McCain, as John McCain has only recently taken this position and offers no legislation and no plan.

This is a very debatable issue. There are facts on both sides that seem to refute any argument made. But I have had to do the research and take a position and, for now, this is my position.

Gay Marriage:

This is not an issue I think much about because I am neither gay nor married, but I understand the evangelicals desire to protect the sanctity of marriage and define it as an exclusive relationship between a man and a woman. I agree with both candidates on this issue as they both oppose gay marriage but protect constitutional rights for domestic partners. In order to oppose civil rights for homosexuals, you would have to change the constitution which I think is dangerous. I agree with McCain and Obama both on this issue as they have stated the same position.

On other issues that are no less important although less heated such as the economy, globalization and trade, the environment and energy, I support Barack Obama’s positions over John McCain’s.

But let me make something very clear. I don’t dislike John McCain. I think he is a good man and a drastic improvement over Republican candidates in the past. I do wish he were a Christian, or would talk about faith, Jesus, Redemption or the Cross. Barack Obama does, very often, and very unashamedly.I am uncomfortable with the idea of a truly secular man in the White House, a man who has no church, no pastor, does not read the Bible and may not even pray. John McCain seems like a good man, but a secular man. I want our next President to talk and listen to God.

So, that is my position, and I will be talking openly about these things on the road. I sincerely appreciate your objective ear. I think people are more important than politics, and I refuse to “vote my identity” rather than vote on the issues. Therefore I won’t get into heated arguments that have no end. I doubt any of you want to do that either. Thanks so much. I don’t intend to keep up the political posts on this site, so don’t worry. We will get back to normal soon.

The Truth About Barack

Sincerely,

 

Don

 

(Added Later by Don)

An addendum: My comments about the candidates personal faith were in reference to pre-presidential politics. Every Presidential candidate that I know of has claimed to be a Christian, and even told folksy stories about conversion. More about Barack’s faith can be found in the new release by Thomas Nelson Publishers entitled “The Faith of Barack Obama” or you can check out his speech at the “Call to Renewal” conference or his Fathers Day speech. Barack has given a half dozen addresses about faith. Will somebody provide me links to McCain’s major addresses on his personal faith and how it will guide his policies? I will gladly post them. I am sure there is something out there. I know he spoke of it at the Saddleback forum on faith. Thanks again.

Comments (129) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

Breaking News Exclusive, Hannah Montana is NOT a Reality Show

*****Breaking News*****Exclusive****

-Donmilleris has recently learned the popular reality television show Hannah Montana is staged. It is not a reality show. Like many Americans, I have been captivated by this program since it debuted in March of 2006, having experienced a long, boring wait for anything worth watching since the cancelation of the Osbornes, another reality show (we think) depicting an average American family.

Many who read this blog will continue believing Hannah Montana is a reality show and the characters are not acting and the extreme tension on the program is not scripted. Please consider the following:

1.     The actress who plays Hannah Montana may also be popular singer Miley Cyrus. Note the following resemblance.

Image One: Left, Singer Miley Cyrus, Right, Hannah Montana (Obviously the same person. In both pictures they are wearing the same string bracelet.)

2.     The character who plays the father on the supposed reality show Hannah Montana is not her father. Her real father is actually once-popular country and western sensation Billy Ray Cyrus best known for his hit single Achey Breaky Heart. Do you need more proof? How about the fact Billy Ray Cyrus and Miley Cyrus have the same last name. And you will also have to contend with this charming Father/Daughter photo:

3.     The show Hannah Montana was created by a man named Michael Poryes, who is credited as co-creator of The Disney Channel’s That’s So Raven, which Donmilleris also revealed as a fraud reality show last year. Poryes has tried to pull another fast one, but we found this interview in which the media mogul, thinking nobody would see the interview because it was done inside the internet and taped in Canada, slipped up bad. Sorry Michael, Don Miller has the internet, and lives close enough to the border to get the Canadian internet, and so you are busted, eh.

 

1.     Michael, why do you need a writers room if it’s a reality show?

2.     “Put together a group of people” Michael? That doesn’t sound like a reality show to me.

3.     Miley? Michael refers to somebody called Miley, rather than Hannah Montana. I wonder why? Maybe it’s the same person? 

4.     Why are you comparing Hannah Montana, a supposed reality show, to House, a documentary? Maybe because you are trying to get us to think Hannah is reality also. Bullcrap. We’re not falling for it.

5.     Wonderful Phenomenon? Try massive marketing ploy.

6.     The internet is the future? No, clocks are the future. They are everywhere, and you can move the hands to reflect the future. Take a physics class, why don’t you, Michael.

And so on, I don’t have to say anything more. This story is developing.

Comments (46) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

Barak Hardley Isn’t Sure

Barak Hardley (left) after another plane crash. This one was during a flight over Antarctica where Barak was looking for “Zoo Animals.”

My friend Barak Hardley contacts me about every three months. I met Barak in a pub in New Mexico, where he had crashed his plane in a field, stayed with firefighters while they put out the flames, then walked over to the pub (we were about one-hundred miles outside Santa Fe, in the high desert) and ordered a beer at the hotel bar. His pant-leg was burned from the crash and flames, but he didn’t want to talk about the crash. (It was the fifth time he’d crashed a plane. He just said he wasn’t a very good pilot and that “these things don’t work like cars.”) Within seconds, he asked what I did and I told him I was a writer and from that point on he wanted to talk about Steinbeck’s Travels with Charlie and whether or not the dog represented Marxist Lenninism, of which I am still uncertain, but Barak had some theories I found interesting.

Regardless, since then Barak sends me cartoons he draws and asks what I think the social commentary might be. Barak is clear there is no social commentary intended, but in his most recent e-mail states:

“..no social commentary for these three, but if there were one, what do you think they would be? I have hurt my brain on this and I can’t figure it out. They fly off my hands, Scout (Barak calls me Scout) and I know they are saying something but what? You gotta help me, Scout. Do you think I am controlled by God? Still haven’t read your book.”

So, I thought I’d introduce you to Barak Hardley and ask what you think his drawings are trying to say, even though he wasn’t trying to say anything with them. You can offer your suggestions as a comment below. Thanks!

#1

#2

#3

Comments (66) | Email This Blog Post Email This Blog Post

 Sign up below and we will let you know when and where Don will be speaking, and we’ll also send you first chapters and unpublished essays whenever they are available. And we won’t give your address away, we promise.




Count Me In!

Text “follow donmilleris” to 40404 and we’ll send you a text message when Don updates his blog. But we won’t send you text messages to say he is stuck in traffic or found a good deal on a raincoat. But we may send you Haiku.

Follow Don

Mentoring has been proven to reduce crime, teen suicide, high-school dropout rates, teen pregnancy and even divorce. And five dollars a month provides a mentor for a fatherless child. Sign up to support a mentor today!

Learn More Shop the Don Miller store